Where 3Cols's free tier stops
3Cols 3Cols does not show a quota on snippets, boards, organizations, API calls, or storage in its free offering. The free tier says you can store, access, and share snippets, collaborate on boards shared by other users, use the VS Code extension, sync from any internet-connected device, browse public snippets, manage organizations, and use the API for all content. The practical stop is not a visible usage cap, but that this is a snippet manager rather than a broader data, IDE, or AI workflow tool.
Switch table
| 3Cols | NocoDB Cloud | Visual Studio Code | Squidex | n:point | OneCompiler | Supermaven | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snippets or records | unlimited | 1,000 records | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown |
| Storage | unlimited | 1 GB | unknown | 500 MB storage | unknown | unknown | unknown |
| API calls per month | all content | 1,000 | unknown | 20,000 API calls per month | all current features free for reasonable use | unlimited code executions | unknown |
| Collaborators or seats | unknown | up to 3 users | unknown | 2 contributors | unknown | unknown | unknown |
| Webhooks or automations | unknown | 100 webhook runs per month | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown |
| Data retention or sync | cloud-synced snippets from any internet-connected device | cloud hosted | local software with automatic updates | content and assets CDN included | web editor and API | browser-based execution | 7-day data retention limit |
| Card required | - | No | Unknown | No | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| First paid tier | - | Plus, $12 per seat / month, billed annually | No paid tiers listed | Basic, €19,00 per month / €190,00 per year | No paid tiers listed | Plus, varies by usage | Pro, $10/month |
The alternatives
NocoDB Cloud
FTV 59 / 100NocoDB Cloud gives you a free hosted database workspace with up to 3 users, 3 editor seats, 10 commenter seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, 100 webhook runs per month, 1,000 API calls per month, and 1 extension. That makes it a better fit when your snippets need to behave more like structured records with permissions and multiple views instead of just text organized in boards. It also adds REST APIs and broader database-style workflows. It falls short on the subject's open-ended free access because the free plan is tightly capped. Switch if your main need is a small shared data app with API access, not a dedicated snippet library.
- Beats 3Cols: Structured records, permissions, and database-style views
- Falls short: No uncapped free storage or snippet-first workflow
- Who should switch: Switch to this if your snippets are really structured data that a small team needs to manage in a database-like workspace.
Visual Studio Code
FTV 90 / 100Visual Studio Code is free to use for developing, testing, and demonstrating applications, and it lets you install Microsoft and third-party extensions, receive automatic updates, and use the software as-is. It is the better free option if your main workflow lives inside the editor and you want an all-purpose development environment rather than a separate cloud snippet repository. It falls short on 3Cols' built-in snippet sharing, cloud-synced snippet library, organization management, and public/private board model. Choose it when you care more about coding in one place than about publishing and organizing snippets as a shared asset.
- Beats 3Cols: Full editor workflow with extensions and local development
- Falls short: No cloud snippet repository or board sharing layer
- Who should switch: Switch to this if you want the editor itself to be the center of your workflow instead of a separate snippet manager.
Squidex
FTV 54 / 100Squidex's free Starter plan includes 20,000 API calls per month, 2 GB traffic, 500 MB storage, 2 contributors, and both Contents CDN and Assets CDN. It is a better fit when snippets are just one kind of content item in a broader headless CMS, especially if you need API delivery with contributor control and CDN-backed content access. It falls short of 3Cols on being a lightweight, always-free snippet organizer, because the free tier is capped and also requires a powered-by label. Switch to it if your use case is content management with API delivery rather than snippet sharing across boards.
- Beats 3Cols: CDN-backed content delivery and CMS structure
- Falls short: Powered-by label and tight monthly caps
- Who should switch: Switch to this if you need a content backend with CDN delivery and contributor controls, not a simple snippet vault.
n:point
FTV 44 / 100n:point keeps all current features free for reasonable use, including API access and a web editor for JSON bins. It is the better free choice when you want a quick place to store and edit small pieces of structured data, especially if JSON itself is the object you work with. It falls short of 3Cols on any clearly defined collaboration model, organization management, public snippet browsing, and explicit unlimited storage or access language. Use it when your main goal is lightweight JSON storage and endpoint sharing, not board-based snippet collaboration.
- Beats 3Cols: Fast JSON storage and endpoint editing
- Falls short: Only reasonable-use limits, with no board collaboration features
- Who should switch: Switch to this if your snippets are really JSON payloads you want to edit and serve through an API.
OneCompiler
FTV 42 / 100OneCompiler's free plan includes unlimited code executions and 25 AI credits per day. That makes it stronger when you need a browser-based place to run code, share it, embed the editor, or connect execution to backend apps. It falls short of 3Cols for snippet repository work because the free tier description is about running code, not organizing, syncing, and sharing a long-lived snippet library. If your goal is execution and experimentation, it is a better match than a snippet manager. Switch when you need to test code more often than you need to catalog it.
- Beats 3Cols: Unlimited code execution and browser-based coding
- Falls short: Not a snippet organization or sharing system
- Who should switch: Switch to this if you care about running and embedding code, not managing a reusable snippet archive.
Supermaven
FTV 41 / 100Supermaven's free tier gives you fast, high-quality code suggestions, works with large codebases, and keeps a 7-day data retention limit. It is the better free pick if your real need is writing code faster inside an editor rather than storing snippets in a separate service. It falls short on 3Cols' cloud snippet access, public and private board sharing, organization management, and API access for all content. Choose it when the value is inline assistance and not a shared snippet database. It is not a direct replacement for snippet storage, but it can reduce how often you need one.
- Beats 3Cols: Inline code suggestions inside the editor
- Falls short: No snippet library, sharing, or API content model
- Who should switch: Switch to this if you want coding assistance in the editor more than you want a separate place to store snippets.
Two quick picks
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code is the closest switch if you already use editor-based workflows, because it is free, supports extensions, and can live alongside your coding setup without forcing a new storage model. It changes the least behavior, but it is not a cloud snippet repository.
NocoDB Cloud
NocoDB Cloud gives the clearest free ceilings on seats, records, storage, API calls, and webhooks, so it offers the most room before a team has to pay. It is not unlimited, but it provides more explicit headroom than the other capped free options here.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a free alternative here that still gives cloud access from anywhere?
Yes. NocoDB Cloud is hosted and accessible online, and 3Cols itself also gives cloud-synced access. If you want a different product with a clearer free quota structure, NocoDB Cloud is the closest match among the capped options.
Which alternative is best if I want to keep working inside my editor?
Visual Studio Code is the best fit for editor-first workflows. It is free, supports extensions, and is easy to keep using as your main development environment, but it does not replace 3Cols as a shared snippet library.
Which option is closest if my snippets are really JSON or structured records?
n:point and NocoDB Cloud are the closest matches. n:point is better for lightweight JSON storage, while NocoDB Cloud is better for structured records with seats, storage, and API quotas.
Do any of these alternatives have no clear free cap like 3Cols?
No alternative here is presented as equally uncapped in the free tier. 3Cols is the only one in this set with no visible quota in the free offering, while the others have explicit limits or reasonable-use conditions.
Bottom line
For the common case, NocoDB Cloud is the best alternative when 3Cols feels too narrow and you want a free tool with clearer room to grow. Its free plan includes seats, records, storage, API calls, and webhook usage, so it is easier to size a small team or structured project around. If you just want to keep coding in an editor, Visual Studio Code is the lighter switch. If you want a snippet repository specifically, 3Cols remains the least constrained option.
Read the full listing for 3Cols. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.