Where Buddy's free tier stops
Buddy Buddy's free tier stops at 1 seat, 1 concurrent pipeline, 300 pipeline GB-minutes, 1 GB of pipeline cache, 300 sandbox CPU-minutes, and 730 sandbox GB-hours. That means it is fine for a single builder with light, consistent usage, but it does not stretch to team access or much breathing room for heavier build and sandbox workloads. Once you need more than one person or more throughput than a small starter workflow can consume, the free plan runs out and a different tool becomes easier to justify.
Switch table
| Buddy | Buildkite | CircleCI | DeployHQ | Azure DevOps | Bitbucket | Deployment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seats or users | 1 seat | 1 active user | Up to 5 active users | 1 user | First 5 users free | Up to 5 users per workspace | 1 user account |
| concurrent jobs or pipelines | 1 concurrent pipeline | 3 concurrent jobs | 30 concurrent job runs for Docker, Linux VM, Arm VM, and Windows VM; 1 concurrent macOS job run | 1 concurrent deployment | 1 Microsoft-hosted CI/CD parallel job and 1 self-hosted CI/CD parallel job | Not specified in free tier items | Up to 10 jobs per month |
| build or pipeline minutes | 300 pipeline GB-minutes | 500 Linux hosted agent minutes per month | Up to 30,000 credits per month | 30 build minutes | 1,800 minutes per month on Microsoft-hosted jobs | 50 build minutes per month | Not specified in free tier items |
| sandbox or hosted compute allowance | 300 sandbox CPU-minutes and 730 sandbox GB-hours | No sandbox quota listed | No sandbox quota listed | No sandbox quota listed | Unlimited minutes on 1 self-hosted job | No sandbox quota listed | Not specified in free tier items |
| storage or cache | 1 GB pipeline cache | 1GB package storage and bandwidth | 2 GB storage | Not specified in free tier items | 2 GiB Azure Artifacts storage per organization | 1 GB total workspace storage and 1 GB Git LFS storage | Unlimited repositories |
| deployment or environment limits | Not specified in free tier items | Not specified in free tier items | Not specified in free tier items | 1 project, 5 servers, 3 deployments per day | Azure Boards, Azure Pipelines, Azure Repos, Azure Artifacts included | Up to 10 deployment environments | Unlimited static sites, unlimited web services, unlimited environments |
| Card required | - | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| First paid tier | - | Pro, $30 USD per active user/mo | Performance, starting at $15 / month | Solo, $9 /mo billed once yearly | Basic, $6 per user per month | Standard, $3.65 per user / month | First Outcome Sprint, $7,500 one-time |
The alternatives
Buildkite
FTV 60 / 100Buildkite's free Personal plan gives you 3 concurrent jobs, 1 active user, 90-day build retention, 50k test executions per month, 1GB of package storage and bandwidth, and 500 Linux hosted agent minutes per month. It also includes community support, Docker and GitHub auth, private orbs, custom agent images, and both hosted and self-hosted agent support. That makes it broader than Buddy on CI workflow variety and testing allowance, while still staying free forever with no credit card and no expiry. It falls short on sandbox-style compute, where Buddy gives explicit CPU-minutes and GB-hours instead of Buildkite's narrower hosted-agent minute pool. Switch if your main need is running and coordinating CI jobs rather than using sandbox environments.
- Beats Buddy: More concurrent jobs and a much larger test execution allowance.
- Falls short: No sandbox CPU-minute or GB-hour allowance like Buddy.
- Who should switch: Switch if you want a broader CI runner setup with more job concurrency and test volume.
CircleCI
FTV 62 / 100CircleCI's free tier includes up to 30,000 credits per month, up to 5 active users, access to Docker, Windows, Linux, Arm, and macOS environments, 30 concurrent job runs for Docker, Linux VM, Arm VM, and Windows VM, 1 concurrent macOS job run, 2 GB of storage, and 5 concurrent self-hosted runner tasks. It also includes Docker layer caching, private orbs, deploys, and community support. Compared with Buddy, this is a much wider environment mix and far more concurrency, which is useful when you need different execution targets rather than a single pipeline lane. It falls short on Buddy's explicit sandbox compute allowances, so it is less directly focused on build sandbox consumption. Switch if environment variety and parallel job volume matter more than sandbox quotas.
- Beats Buddy: Broader execution environments and much higher concurrency.
- Falls short: No explicit sandbox CPU-minute or GB-hour allowance.
- Who should switch: Switch if you need multiple OS targets or lots of parallel CI runs.
DeployHQ
FTV 54 / 100DeployHQ's free plan includes 3 deployments per day, 1 project, 5 servers, 1 concurrent deployment, 30 build minutes, 1 user, auto-deploy on push, zero downtime deployments, API access, team management, custom domains, SSO, and support. That is a strong fit for deployment automation rather than general CI runtime, and it is more generous than Buddy on deployment-oriented features like project and server management. It falls short on raw build and sandbox capacity, where Buddy offers more explicit execution allowance through pipeline GB-minutes and sandbox quotas. If your work is mostly shipping code to servers or cloud targets, DeployHQ can feel closer to the job. Switch if you need deployment controls more than build-room headroom.
- Beats Buddy: Stronger deployment-oriented feature set and more deployment-specific workflow tooling.
- Falls short: Much smaller build-time allowance and no sandbox compute quota.
- Who should switch: Switch if your main use case is deployment automation, not CI sandbox usage.
Azure DevOps
FTV 48 / 100Azure DevOps gives the first 5 users free for Basic access, plus 1 Microsoft-hosted CI/CD parallel job with 1,800 minutes per month, 1 self-hosted CI/CD parallel job with unlimited minutes per month, 2 GiB of Azure Artifacts storage, Azure Boards, Azure Pipelines, Azure Repos with unlimited private Git repositories, and stakeholder access to view dashboards and wikis. It is a larger platform than Buddy in terms of planning, repositories, and artifacts, and the free user count is much more team-friendly. It falls short on Buddy's sandbox-specific quotas and does require a credit card, so the tradeoff is breadth over frictionless sign-up. Switch if you want one system for repos, boards, artifacts, and pipelines.
- Beats Buddy: More free users and a broader DevOps platform footprint.
- Falls short: Requires a credit card and does not offer Buddy-style sandbox quotas.
- Who should switch: Switch if you want planning, repos, artifacts, and pipelines in one free workspace.
Bitbucket
FTV 42 / 100Bitbucket's free cloud plan includes up to 5 users per workspace, 1 GB total workspace storage, 50 build minutes per month, 1 GB Git LFS storage, unlimited private repositories, unlimited pull request reviewers, Jira integration, CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines, merge checks, dynamic CI/CD pipelines, and community-only support. That is a good fit when your workflow starts with Git hosting and code review, then extends into light CI. It beats Buddy on repository collaboration and private repo handling, but it falls short on execution and sandbox headroom, where Buddy's free tier is much larger in raw compute-style allowances. It also requires a credit card. Switch if source control and review are the center of your workflow.
- Beats Buddy: Better Git hosting and code review foundation with unlimited private repositories.
- Falls short: Smaller build allowance and no sandbox CPU-minute or GB-hour quota.
- Who should switch: Switch if your free-tier priority is repository collaboration plus light CI.
Deployment
FTV 47 / 100Deployment's free tier includes 1 user account, up to 10 jobs per month, unlimited static sites, unlimited web services, unlimited repositories, unlimited environments, custom domains with HTTPS, response headers, logs, Slack notifications, automatic deployments on git push, automatic previews on pull requests, RBAC, and an AI-powered DevOps assistant. It is the most generous of the supplied options on always-free infrastructure-like breadth, especially for web app deployment layouts and unlimited environments. It falls short on Buddy's explicit build and sandbox quotas, so it is less useful if you are buying free compute headroom rather than deployment surface area. Because the free page does not state whether a card is required, that part stays unknown. Switch if you want free deployment structure more than execution quota.
- Beats Buddy: Unlimited environments, repositories, and deployment-facing features.
- Falls short: Only 10 jobs per month and no explicit sandbox compute allowance.
- Who should switch: Switch if you want the widest free deployment surface and can live with very low job volume.
Two quick picks
DeployHQ
DeployHQ is the closest match if you are mainly using Buddy for deployment automation. It keeps the workflow centered on push-based deploys, build minutes, servers, environments, and a single user, so the switch changes the least about how you ship.
CircleCI
CircleCI gives the most free headroom overall because it pairs high concurrency with a broad set of environments and a large monthly credits pool. For teams that can adapt to a CI-first workflow, it stretches the farthest before free limits become a problem.
Frequently asked questions
Which alternative is closest if I only need deployment automation?
DeployHQ is the closest fit because it is built around deployments, servers, build minutes, and single-user usage rather than a broader platform shift.
Which alternative gives the most free concurrency?
CircleCI, because its free tier includes up to 30 concurrent job runs for several environments, which is far above Buddy's single concurrent pipeline.
Which alternative is best if I need more users on the free plan?
Azure DevOps and Bitbucket both allow up to 5 users on their free tiers, while Buildkite stays at 1 active user.
Which alternative is least like Buddy?
Deployment is the least drop-in choice because it focuses on unlimited deployment surfaces with a very small monthly job cap rather than Buddy-style pipeline and sandbox quotas.
Bottom line
For most builders who outgrow Buddy's free tier, CircleCI is the best alternative because it offers the most free room to grow without forcing an early paid upgrade. Its free plan has far more concurrency, more user capacity, and broad environment support, so it suits teams that need to keep running many jobs before money becomes involved. If your workflow is mostly deployment-centric rather than CI-centric, DeployHQ is the closer fit, but CircleCI is the better default answer for the common case.
Read the full listing for Buddy. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.