Where Cloudflare Workers's free tier stops
Cloudflare Workers Cloudflare Workers' free tier is usable, but it is capped. The key stopping point is 100,000 requests per day and 10 ms of CPU per request. That makes it fine for light APIs, edge logic, and experiments, but it is not built for sustained traffic or CPU-heavy work. The free plan also focuses on the base platform, while the included site-security features are separate benefits. If your usage regularly exceeds that request or CPU ceiling, you will need another option.
Switch table
| Cloudflare Workers | Prefect Cloud | Cloud 66 | Leapcell | Deno Deploy | Azure Container Apps | Vercel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| requests | 100,000 requests per day | Not specified | Up to 5 deployments per 24 hours | 100,000 serverless invocations per month | 1M requests per month | 2 million requests per subscription per month | 1M Edge Requests per month |
| compute | 10 ms CPU per request | 500 serverless credits per month | 50 build minutes | 3 GB-hours of serverless duration per month | 15 hours of CPU time per month | 180,000 vCPU-seconds per subscription per month | 4 hours of Vercel Functions active CPU per month |
| storage | Not specified | Not specified | 100 MB managed backup storage | Not specified | 1 GiB volume storage per month and 1 GiB KV storage | Not specified | 1 GB Blob storage per month |
| domains | Not specified | Not specified | 1 static site | Not specified | Up to 50 custom domains per organization | Not specified | Included, but no custom-domain quota stated |
| team seats | Not specified | Up to 2 users | 1 team member | Not specified | Up to 5 team members | Not specified | 1 developer seat |
| api rate limit | Not specified | 625 requests per minute | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 1M allowed requests per month for rate limiting |
| Card required | - | No | No | No | No | Yes | Unknown |
| First paid tier | - | Starter - Contact sales | Developer - $23/month | Hobby - $0 per seat / month | Pro - $20/month | Consumption plan - Varies by usage | Pro - $20/mo |
The alternatives
Prefect Cloud
FTV 52 / 100Prefect Cloud's free Hobby tier gives you up to 2 users, 1 workspace, 5 deployments, 500 serverless credits per month, 5 automations, 7 days of run retention, and a 625 requests per minute API rate limit. That makes it a free orchestration layer for Python workflows rather than a pure edge runtime. It beats Cloudflare Workers on workflow management because it includes deployments, automations, and run retention in one place. It falls short on raw request volume and edge compute style execution. Switch here if your main job is scheduling, monitoring, and coordinating workflows instead of serving requests at the edge.
- Beats Cloudflare Workers: Workflow orchestration, deployments, and run retention
- Falls short: Far less suited to edge request handling and CPU-per-request workloads
- Who should switch: Switch if you are orchestrating Python workflows and want free hosted control-plane features.
Cloud 66
FTV 58 / 100Cloud 66's free plan includes 1 deployment server, 1 static site, up to 5 deployments per 24 hours, 50 build minutes, 1 GB of free static site traffic, 1 team member, 100 MB of managed backup storage, daily backups, 1 hour of metrics retention, and Slack support. It is a better fit for builders deploying apps onto their own cloud or servers. It beats Cloudflare Workers on traditional deployment controls like servers, backups, and metrics. It falls short on global edge execution and request scale. Switch if you want a free app-ops layer for a single server or static site rather than serverless edge compute.
- Beats Cloudflare Workers: Deployment server and backup-oriented app operations
- Falls short: No global edge execution or request-centric compute model
- Who should switch: Switch if you deploy onto your own infrastructure and need simple free app management.
Leapcell
FTV 56 / 100Leapcell's free Hobby plan gives 20 projects, up to 3 vCPUs and 4 GB RAM per project, 100,000 serverless invocations per month, 3 GB-hours of serverless duration, 2 GB of data transfer, 10 GB of inbound large payloads, up to 900 seconds maximum invocation timeout, 100,000 Redis commands, build minutes, async invocations, logs, and metrics retention. It is broader than Cloudflare Workers because it combines compute, Redis, builds, logs, and async jobs in one free tier. It beats Workers on runtime flexibility and included storage and background task support. It falls short on the simplicity of pure edge request serving. Switch if you need a free app platform with databases, tasks, and longer-running jobs.
- Beats Cloudflare Workers: Broader app-platform features like Redis, async tasks, and longer runtimes
- Falls short: Less of a pure edge runtime and request-first platform
- Who should switch: Switch if you want one free platform for web apps, background work, and storage.
Deno Deploy
FTV 58 / 100Deno Deploy's free tier includes 1M inbound HTTP requests per month, 20 GB egress bandwidth, up to 50 custom domains per organization, up to 15 hours of CPU time, 350 GB-hours of memory time, up to 20 active apps, up to 5 team members, 1 GiB volume storage, 1 GiB of KV storage, KV read and write quotas, caching, logs, analytics, Terraform deployment, and sandboxed code execution. It is a closer app-hosting alternative with more explicit platform quotas than Workers. It beats Cloudflare Workers on monthly request headroom and included storage-like primitives. It falls short on Cloudflare's broader security and network stack. Switch if you want a free JavaScript or TypeScript host with clearer app quotas and deployment tooling.
- Beats Cloudflare Workers: Higher monthly request headroom and more built-in app hosting quotas
- Falls short: Less emphasis on edge security and network services
- Who should switch: Switch if you want a TypeScript-friendly host with generous free platform quotas.
Azure Container Apps
FTV 49 / 100Azure Container Apps' free tier includes the first 180,000 vCPU-seconds, 360,000 GiB-seconds, and 2 million requests per subscription per month. It is a consumption-style container service, so the free allowance is about compute and request usage rather than edge functions. It beats Cloudflare Workers on running containerized workloads and on the shape of its compute quota, especially for apps that expect more conventional service runtimes. It falls short on the low-friction edge deployment model and the included security/network stack. Switch here if your app is container-first and you want a free recurring allowance for compute.
- Beats Cloudflare Workers: Container-native compute quotas with recurring monthly allowances
- Falls short: Not an edge-function platform and less focused on instant global delivery
- Who should switch: Switch if your workload is containerized and you want free monthly compute allowances.
Vercel
FTV 53 / 100Vercel's free Hobby plan is free forever for personal, non-commercial use and includes repo import and instant deploys, automatic CI/CD, WAF protection, global CDN delivery, Fluid compute, DDoS mitigation, traffic and performance insights, 1M Edge Requests per month, 100 GB Fast Data Transfer, 1 GB Blob storage, Functions quotas, Sandbox quotas, 1 developer seat, unlimited viewer seats, security features, and team-level RBAC. It is more opinionated as an app platform than Workers, with a richer front-end deployment workflow. It beats Workers on developer workflow breadth and included app-platform extras. It falls short if you want a general-purpose edge runtime without the non-commercial limitation. Switch if you are building a personal web app and want the most complete free hosting workflow.
- Beats Cloudflare Workers: Broader app-hosting workflow and more bundled developer experience
- Falls short: Restricted to personal, non-commercial use on the free plan
- Who should switch: Switch if you are shipping a personal web app and want the broadest free hosting stack.
Two quick picks
Deno Deploy
Deno Deploy is the closest drop-in for teams already thinking in serverless edge terms. It keeps the same basic model of request-driven code at the edge, but with a larger monthly request allowance and familiar web app deployment patterns for JavaScript and TypeScript.
Vercel
Vercel gives the most free headroom for the broadest set of app-building tasks, with large bundled quotas for requests, transfer, storage, functions, analytics, and team collaboration. If you want one free plan that stretches across hosting and frontend workflows, it leaves the most room before paying.
Frequently asked questions
Which alternative is closest to Cloudflare Workers for edge-style code execution?
Deno Deploy is the closest match because it is also centered on serverless edge execution for web apps, with request-based quotas, caching, and deployment tooling.
Which free alternative is best if I need workflow orchestration instead of edge functions?
Prefect Cloud is the better fit because its free tier is built around deployments, automations, and run retention for workflows rather than request-serving code.
Which option is best for containerized apps?
Azure Container Apps is the clearest container-first alternative because its free tier is measured in vCPU-seconds, GiB-seconds, and requests for container workloads.
Do any of these alternatives require a credit card?
Azure Container Apps does; Prefect Cloud does too. Cloud 66 and Leapcell do not. For Deno Deploy and Vercel, the provided information does not clearly state a card requirement, so it is best treated as unknown.
Bottom line
For most builders who have outgrown Cloudflare Workers' free ceiling, Deno Deploy is the best first place to look. It stays closest to the same edge-app shape, keeps a request-based model, and adds a more app-hosting-oriented free tier with storage, domains, logs, and deployment tooling. If you mainly want a familiar replacement with less behavior change, start there. If your real need is workflow orchestration, containers, or a broader app platform, the better fit shifts to one of the more specialized options above.
Read the full listing for Cloudflare Workers. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.