Alternatives

6 free alternatives to Cosmic

Builders who need more than 1 bucket, 2 team members, or 1,000 objects should look elsewhere, because Cosmic's free tier is useful but quickly caps collaboration, content volume, and workflow count.

Category: Headless CMSVerified

Where Cosmic's free tier stops

Cosmic Cosmic's free tier stops at 1 bucket, 2 team members, 1 project, and 1,000 objects, so it is best for a small workspace or a lightweight prototype. It also caps the built-in automation layer at 1 agent and 1 workflow, content modeling at 50 object types, and monthly usage at 300k AI tokens, 10k non-cached API requests, 100k cached API requests, 1GB API bandwidth, 1,000 media files, 1GB media storage, 1M media requests, 1GB media bandwidth, 100K analytics events, and 30 days of retention.

Switch table

CosmicContentfulHygraphPrismicSanityStoryblokSquidex
Buckets or spaces1 bucket1 Starter Space1 environment-based project1 repository2 public datasets1 spaceUnknown
Team seats or users2 team members10 users3 seats1 user accountUp to 20 user seatsUp to 2 user seats total2 contributors
Content items or entries1,000 objectsUnknown1,000 entriesUnlimited documentsUnknownUnknownUnknown
API calls per month10k non-cached API requests + 100k cached API requests100K API calls per month500,000 API calls4 million API calls per monthUnknown100,000 API requests per month20,000 API calls per month
Media or asset storage1GB media storageUnknownUnlimited asset storageUnlimited assetsHosted real-time content databaseUnknown500 MB storage
Traffic or CDN bandwidth1GB API bandwidth + 1GB media bandwidth50 GB CDN bandwidth per month100 GB asset traffic100 GB built-in CDN bandwidth per monthUnknown100GB traffic per month2 GB traffic included
Card required-YesNoNoYesNoNo
First paid tier-Lite, $300/monthGrowth, from $199/monthStarter, $10/month per repository, paid annuallyGrowth, $15 per seat/monthStarter, FreeBasic, €19,00 per month

The alternatives

Contentful

FTV 64 / 100

Contentful's free plan gives you 1 Starter Space, access for 10 users, 2 roles, 2 locales, 100K API calls per month, and 50 GB of CDN bandwidth per month. It is a straightforward headless CMS setup with structured content, developer tools, and an editorial interface, so a team can model content and publish without paying while staying inside familiar CMS workflows. The main benefit over Cosmic is broader team access, with room for more collaborators before a plan change. The tradeoff is that it is still a card-gated free plan, and it does not include Cosmic's AI tokens, agents, workflows, or media-request allowances. Switch if your immediate bottleneck is user count rather than automation.

  • Beats Cosmic: 10 users and 2 roles, versus Cosmic's 2 team members
  • Falls short: No AI tokens, agents, or workflows in the free tier
  • Who should switch: Switch if you need more editors on the free plan and do not need Cosmic's built-in AI workflow features.

Hygraph

FTV 80 / 100

Hygraph's free Hobby plan includes 2 locales, 3 seats, 2 standard roles, 10 components, unlimited asset storage, a 50MB maximum asset upload size, live preview, commenting and assignment workflow, 1,000 entries, 500,000 API calls, 100 GB asset traffic, 5 uncached requests per second, 1 environment, 5 webhooks, 3 API tokens, 100,000 AI tokens, 2 content stages, and 2 models. It is a strong fit for structured content teams that want both collaboration and higher delivery headroom on the free plan. Compared with Cosmic, it offers more API capacity and more content-ops features while keeping a free, perpetual entry point. It falls short on breadth of media management and on Cosmic's bucket-based setup. Switch if you want a more generous free API ceiling and a GraphQL-first CMS.

  • Beats Cosmic: 500,000 API calls and more collaboration features on the free plan
  • Falls short: Fewer locales and a more rigid asset upload limit than Cosmic
  • Who should switch: Switch if API throughput matters more than Cosmic's bucket and media allowances.

Prismic

FTV 61 / 100

Prismic's free plan includes 1 user account, 4 million API calls per month with no overages, 100 GB of built-in CDN bandwidth per month with no overages, 2 locales, Visual Page Builder access, unlimited documents, unlimited types, unlimited assets, image optimization and processing, and Migration API access. It is especially friendly to teams building content-led sites, because the free tier keeps document and asset counts open while leaving meaningful room for traffic and API usage. It beats Cosmic on API volume by a wide margin and on content/modeling freedom with unlimited documents and assets. It falls short on collaboration, since the free plan is limited to one user account, and it does not include Cosmic's team-oriented bucket setup or agent/workflow limits. Switch if you are a solo builder who wants generous publishing headroom.

  • Beats Cosmic: 4 million API calls and unlimited documents/assets on the free plan
  • Falls short: Only 1 user account, versus Cosmic's 2 team members
  • Who should switch: Switch if you are mostly solo and want far more free publishing volume than Cosmic offers.

Sanity

FTV 48 / 100

Sanity's free tier includes up to 20 user seats, 2 permission roles, 2 public datasets, unlimited content types and locales, a Content Agent for AI-assisted operations, Agent Context, Compute and Agent Actions, a hosted real-time content database, and live previews with visual editing. It is aimed at teams that want room to collaborate and experiment without paying until they outgrow seats, roles, or dataset limits. Its biggest advantage over Cosmic is the much larger collaboration ceiling and the broader built-in AI and automation layer. It falls short on explicit monthly API, media, and traffic quotas, because the free plan is framed more around seats and datasets than usage allowances. Switch if team size and AI workflows matter more than raw request caps.

  • Beats Cosmic: Up to 20 seats and a richer AI/automation layer
  • Falls short: No explicit monthly API, media, or traffic quotas like Cosmic
  • Who should switch: Switch if your team is growing and you care more about seats and workflow tools than bucket-based limits.

Storyblok

FTV 62 / 100

Storyblok's free Starter plan includes 1 space, 1 user seat included with up to 2 user seats total, 100GB traffic per month, 100,000 API requests per month, 2 locales, and 25,000 AI credits. It is a practical choice for content teams that want a visual editor and a low-friction start for a small site or app. It beats Cosmic on traffic volume and on having a visual editing workflow built in, while still giving a perpetual free tier. It falls short on collaboration depth and automation breadth, since the free plan stays at 2 total seats and does not mirror Cosmic's bucket, agent, and workflow model. Switch if you need a visual CMS with more traffic headroom than Cosmic's free tier.

  • Beats Cosmic: 100GB traffic per month and a visual editor workflow
  • Falls short: Only 2 total user seats, and no agent/workflow setup like Cosmic
  • Who should switch: Switch if visual editing and traffic capacity are more important than Cosmic's automation features.

Squidex

FTV 54 / 100

Squidex's free Starter plan includes 20,000 API calls per month, 2 GB traffic, 500 MB storage, 2 contributors, and both Contents CDN and Assets CDN. It is the most lightweight option here, but it is also a real free CMS starter with content delivery and assets delivery included. Its main advantage over Cosmic is simplicity for very small deployments, especially if your needs are mostly API, traffic, and storage rather than workspace structure or AI tools. It falls short on almost every scale point compared with Cosmic, including objects, team size, buckets, media storage, and AI workflows, and it also requires a powered-by label. Switch only if your project is tiny and you want a small, open-source-style CMS footprint.

  • Beats Cosmic: Simple API, traffic, and storage limits for tiny projects
  • Falls short: Much lower limits than Cosmic on team size, content volume, and media
  • Who should switch: Switch if you only need a very small starter CMS and do not need Cosmic's richer free quotas.

Two quick picks

Closest drop-in

Storyblok

Storyblok is the closest drop-in for teams that want a familiar headless CMS with a visual editor, small-team collaboration, and monthly API and traffic quotas. It keeps the switching pattern simple for content-led sites while staying on a perpetual free plan.

Most free headroom

Prismic

Prismic gives the most free headroom because it allows 4 million API calls, 100 GB of CDN bandwidth, unlimited documents, unlimited types, and unlimited assets. That leaves the most room before a team has to consider payment.

Frequently asked questions

Which alternative is closest to Cosmic for a small content team?

Storyblok is the closest fit if you want a typical headless CMS workflow, visual editing, and similar small-team usage patterns without changing how you model and publish content too much.

Which free alternative has the highest API allowance?

Prismic has the highest free API ceiling in this set, with 4 million API calls per month and no overages.

Which option is best if I need more collaborators for free?

Sanity is the strongest option for collaboration headroom, with up to 20 user seats on the free tier.

Which alternative is best if I want more media or asset capacity?

Hygraph and Prismic are the strongest choices for media headroom, with unlimited asset storage in Hygraph and unlimited assets in Prismic.

Bottom line

For most builders who have outgrown Cosmic's free tier, Storyblok is the best next stop. It keeps the headless CMS workflow recognizable, gives a visual editor, and offers enough monthly traffic and API requests to support a real small project. If your main constraint is collaboration, pick Sanity instead. If your main constraint is raw delivery capacity, Prismic is the stronger choice. But for the common case of wanting a familiar CMS with a little more room, Storyblok is the safest switch.

Read the full listing for Cosmic. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.