6 free alternatives to Element

Gitter is entirely free for all public conversations and all private conversations, so there is no visible usage cap to work around on the core chat surface. It is built around Matrix, which means people can use the Gitter web app or any Matrix client to reach the same rooms. For teams that want a simple community chat home with public and private rooms and do not want to run their own server, the free offer is straightforward. It is best when the main goal is running discussions rather than managing a self-hosted deployment.

• Beats Element: Managed access to public and private conversations without running your own homeserver.
• Falls short: It does not give you Element's self-hosted community edition or its broader enterprise deployment shape.
• Who should switch: Switch to Gitter if you want a Matrix-based chat home that stays free without self-hosting.

See the full listing · Compare with Element

Webex's free plan covers unlimited meetings with a 40-minute cap per meeting, up to 100 attendees, screen sharing with annotation, unlimited whiteboards, local recording, calendar service integration, advanced noise cancellation, unlimited messaging, Vidcast video creation, advanced security, leading app integrations, and basic support. That makes it a broad collaboration bundle rather than a chat-first system. Compared with Element, the main attraction is the built-in meetings workflow and the fact that the service is hosted for you. It is a better fit when your team needs scheduled meetings and collaboration tools in one place.

• Beats Element: Built-in meetings, whiteboards, recording, and scheduling in a hosted product.
• Falls short: It does not offer Element's self-hosted, air-gapped, Matrix-based deployment model.
• Who should switch: Switch to Webex if your team wants hosted collaboration with meetings as a first-class free feature.

See the full listing

Stream's free Build plan includes all Chat features, 1,000 monthly active users, 100 concurrent connections, community support, and no credit card requirement. That is a useful fit for product teams embedding chat into an app rather than adopting a standalone team messenger. The free plan is clearly capped, but it gives developers a ready-made API and SDK layer for realtime chat instead of infrastructure to operate. It is strongest when you want to ship chat features quickly and keep initial overhead low. If you are building an app and want a hosted chat backend, Stream is the closest developer-centric option here.

• Beats Element: Developer-friendly hosted chat APIs and SDKs with a small free usage allowance.
• Falls short: It does not replace Element's full end-user messaging app, encryption-first workspace, or self-hosted control.
• Who should switch: Switch to Stream if you are embedding chat into software and want a free API plan first.

See the full listing

Flock's free tier includes unlimited 1-1 and group messages, 10,000 searchable messages, 10 public channels, 5 GB total storage per team, a single team admin, and 1-1 video calls. It is a conventional team chat workspace with clear limits, which can be easier to adopt than a self-hosted deployment. The free plan is best for small teams that want a shared workspace and can live within fixed storage and history ceilings. Compared with Element, Flock is the more guided, hosted option, but it gives up the unlimited-history, self-hosted model that Element's community edition is built around.

• Beats Element: Simple hosted team chat with a defined free workspace limit and built-in calling.
• Falls short: It falls short on unlimited history and the self-hosted, open-source deployment model.
• Who should switch: Switch to Flock if you want a small hosted workspace and do not need to operate your own server.

See the full listing

Pumble's free plan is perpetual and includes unlimited users, unlimited message history, unlimited channels, voice and video messages, 1:1 voice and video meetings, native Clockify and Plaky integrations, Slack import, 10 GB storage per workspace, export from public channels, quote messages, and up to 3 apps and integrations. For small teams that want a hosted chat app with generous baseline limits, it is a strong low-friction option. Its free tier is especially appealing when you care about unlimited users and message history but do not want to self-host. It is most attractive as a ready-to-use team workspace.

• Beats Element: Hosted team chat with unlimited users, unlimited history, and a clear free workspace.
• Falls short: It does not match Element's self-hosted, air-gapped, or Matrix-native deployment flexibility.
• Who should switch: Switch to Pumble if you want hosted chat with generous free limits and minimal setup.

See the full listing

ConnectyCube's free plan includes public cloud hosting, up to 1,000 users per account, 5 GB storage, a 1 month retention policy, P2P audio/video calls, client-side video recording, and community support via GitHub and Stack Overflow. It is aimed at developers who want to add chat and calling into their own products with a hosted backend. The free tier is useful as a starter environment when you need a messaging and calling SDK rather than a full team chat app. Compared with Element, it trades workspace features for development flexibility and a managed cloud entry point.

• Beats Element: Hosted SDK-based messaging and calling for app builders, with a defined free quota.
• Falls short: It does not provide Element's full team chat interface, end-to-end collaboration set, or self-hosted control.
• Who should switch: Switch to ConnectyCube if you are building in-app chat and calling features instead of choosing a team messenger.

See the full listing