6 free alternatives to EmailJS

Mailjet's free tier includes 6,000 emails per month with a 200 emails per day sending limit, 1,000 contacts, API access, SMTP Relay, webhooks, an advanced email editor, basic statistics, and a form builder. That makes it much more usable for teams that need both sending capacity and a few built-in creation tools. Its main advantage over EmailJS is scale, since the monthly volume is far higher. Its main downside is that it is broader and more team-oriented, so it is less of a simple client-side email helper. Switch if you want a bigger free send quota and a fuller email workflow.

• Beats EmailJS: Much higher monthly sending volume.
• Falls short: Less lightweight for direct client-side template triggering.
• Who should switch: Switch to Mailjet if your main problem is EmailJS's tiny request cap and you want a free plan that can cover real ongoing sending.

See the full listing

MailerSend's free tier gives 500 emails per month, 10 email verification credits, email threads support, and a drag-and-drop email builder. Free access also includes the core sending path through its email API and SMTP relay product line, though the free-tier list itself is narrower than some rivals. It beats EmailJS on monthly send capacity and on built-in email building tools. It falls short on simplicity for developers who only want to trigger reusable templates directly from code, because it is a more full-featured sending platform. Choose it if you need a bit more room and a visual builder alongside transactional sending.

• Beats EmailJS: More monthly emails and a drag-and-drop builder.
• Falls short: Less focused on simple code-triggered template sending.
• Who should switch: Switch to MailerSend if you need more free sends than EmailJS and want a visual builder in the same product.

See the full listing

EmailLabs' free tier includes up to 9,000 emails per month, 300 emails per day, RESTful API and SMTP Relay access, email templates, detailed documentation, basic analytics, 1 day of log retention, validation for internal non-existent addresses, local-provider sending adjustments, and a shared IP address. That is a strong fit for builders who need a sending service with more room to grow and some operational visibility. It beats EmailJS on volume, deliverability-oriented features, and logging. It falls short on being a small, simple front-end email helper. Switch if you care more about sending infrastructure than about a minimal template bridge.

• Beats EmailJS: Much higher monthly volume and better sending infrastructure features.
• Falls short: Less minimal for quick client-side integrations.
• Who should switch: Switch to EmailLabs if EmailJS's low volume and limited history are the bottlenecks, and you want a free plan with more operational headroom.

See the full listing

Emitlo's free tier includes 12,000 emails per month for early signups, 400 emails per day, 50 emails per hour, 3 sending domains, 3 API/SMTP credentials, 14 days of log history, a 10 MB attachment cap, REST API and SMTP relay access, DKIM/SPF/DMARC authentication, real-time analytics, real-time events, and webhooks. It is the strongest free option here for raw sending headroom and delivery tooling. It beats EmailJS on nearly every operational axis: volume, rate limits, domains, credentials, logs, and attachments. It falls short only if you want the simplest possible front-end template trigger. Switch if you need a free transactional email stack with room to spare.

• Beats EmailJS: Largest free sending capacity and the most delivery tooling.
• Falls short: More infrastructure-heavy than a simple client-side email service.
• Who should switch: Switch to Emitlo if you want the most free headroom and can handle a fuller email delivery setup.

See the full listing

Wraps' free tier includes a dashboard and AI template editor, 5K tracked events per month, 1 workflow, unlimited contacts, a CLI, a TypeScript SDK, and 10 AI template generations per month. It is free to start and does not require a credit card. While it is not a direct SMTP-style email relay, it is useful for builders who want email infrastructure with tracking and workflow support. It beats EmailJS on workflow depth and event tracking. It falls short on being a straightforward email-sending API because the product centers on an AWS-backed infrastructure model. Pick it if your use case has grown from simple templates into event-driven email automation.

• Beats EmailJS: Better workflow and event-tracking model.
• Falls short: Not a simple drop-in replacement for sending email directly from code.
• Who should switch: Switch to Wraps if EmailJS is too narrow and you are ready for workflow-based email infrastructure.

See the full listing

Resend's free tier includes sending and receiving emails, a 3,000 emails per month quota, RESTful API access, SMTP relay, official SDKs, scheduled emails, batch sending, open tracking, link tracking, React Email, 1 custom domain, 30 days of data retention, 1 webhook endpoint, all webhook events, ticket support, 10,000 automation runs, and 5 AI credits per month. It is a substantial free plan for developer-first email work. It beats EmailJS on sending volume, built-in developer tooling, tracking, automations, and domain support. It falls short on card requirements, since a card is required, and it is more than EmailJS in scope. Switch if you want a modern API-first email platform and can live with the activation requirement.

• Beats EmailJS: More sending capacity plus stronger API, tracking, and automation features.
• Falls short: A card is required, and it is a broader platform than EmailJS.
• Who should switch: Switch to Resend if you want a richer developer email stack and the EmailJS free cap is too small.

See the full listing · Compare with EmailJS