Where Mintlify's free tier stops
Mintlify Mintlify's free tier gives you the full platform, a custom domain, the web editor, the MCP server, custom components, and agent optimizations. The practical stop point is not a trial clock but feature scope: the free tier does not move into the paid Pro layer, where Agent, Assistant, Automations, preview deployments, and admin APIs appear, and where editor seats become unlimited. If your team has already outgrown 5 editors or needs those higher-end controls, the free tier ends there.
Switch table
| Mintlify | Slite | Bump.sh | ReadMe | GitBook | Slab | SimpleLocalize | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| editor seats or users | 5 editor seats | Not specified | 3 internal users | 1 admin included | 1 free user | Up to 10 users | Not specified |
| projects or docs | Unlimited platform access | Unlimited docs | Up to 10 API docs | 1 project | Not specified | Unlimited posts and topics | Access to 10 projects |
| published versions | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 1 published version | Not specified | 90 days of version history | Not specified |
| storage or attachment cap | Not specified | 5 GB attachment storage per user | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 10 MB attachments | Unlimited strings |
| AI or agent quota | Access to agent optimizations | 30 AI Answers per user/month; 50 AI Editor responses per user/month | Not specified | AI dropdown and MCP Server included; no quota stated | GitBook Agent, 10 messages per week | Not specified | Not specified |
| history or analytics window | Not specified | Doc history; workspace analytics | Not specified | 24 hours of request history; 24 hours of detailed logs | Page view analytics | 30 days of usage analytics | 90 days of activity and history log |
| Card required | - | No | No | No | Unknown | No | No |
| First paid tier | - | Basic, $10 per user/month billed yearly | Basic, $50/month | Pro, $250/month billed annually | Premium, $65 per site/month + $12 per user/month billed annually | Startup, $6.67 per user/month billed annually | Community, price not listed |
The alternatives
Slite
FTV 60 / 100Slite's free offer is a 14-day trial of Standard, so you get a broad working set during the trial rather than a narrow forever-free plan. Free access includes unlimited docs, public API access, integrations, media embeds, comments, guest collaborators, exports, analytics, and doc history. It also gives 5 GB of attachment storage per user and 30 AI Answers questions per user per month. For teams that want a knowledge base with stronger internal search and collaboration workflows during evaluation, it covers a lot.
- Beats Mintlify: AI writing and answer limits are spelled out and higher than Mintlify's free AI access.
- Falls short: It is a 14-day trial, not a perpetual free tier.
- Who should switch: Switch here if you want to evaluate a fuller knowledge base workflow before committing and a temporary trial is good enough.
Bump.sh
FTV 38 / 100Bump.sh's free offer covers up to 10 API docs, 3 internal users, and 20 guest users, plus OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, OpenAPI Overlays, CLI and GitHub integration, a custom domain and logo, and documentation hubs. It is built for API documentation portals rather than general knowledge bases, so the free tier is useful if your docs are API-first and you care about structured publishing and doc-as-code workflows. The free plan is more narrowly focused than Mintlify, but it gives you a defined doc count and user mix right away.
- Beats Mintlify: It gives a published API-doc hosting workflow with explicit doc and user quotas.
- Falls short: It is weaker for broader knowledge-base and editorial workflows than Mintlify.
- Who should switch: Switch here if your documentation is mainly API reference material and you want a capped but specialized hosting setup.
ReadMe
FTV 69 / 100ReadMe's free tier is perpetual and includes 1 project, 1 published version, documentation metrics, the ReadMe API, bidirectional sync, custom MDX components, recipes, a changelog, discussion forums, a landing page, custom HTML pages, branches, reusable content, PDF export, a theme editor, a custom domain, health check integration, custom CSS and JavaScript, an AI dropdown, LLMs.txt, and an MCP Server. It also includes 1 admin and 24 hours of request history and logs. For teams that want a docs site with interactive and extensible publishing tools, the free tier is broad.
- Beats Mintlify: It includes metrics, versioned docs, branches, and a richer publishing toolset on the free plan.
- Falls short: It is limited to 1 project and 1 published version.
- Who should switch: Switch here if you need a more feature-rich docs workflow for a single product or API site.
GitBook
FTV 62 / 100GitBook's free tier is strong for a single-user docs setup. It includes 1 free user, unlimited page views, a block-based visual editor with Markdown support, GitHub or GitLab sync, interactive API playgrounds, preview deployments, LLM optimizations, page analytics, full-text search, change requests, version history, comments, integrations, imports from common formats, basic roles, Google or email domain SSO, and email support. The free plan is broad on publishing and collaboration mechanics, even if it stays individual-focused.
- Beats Mintlify: It offers more publishing and workflow depth, including preview deployments and interactive API playgrounds.
- Falls short: It is limited to 1 free user, so collaboration is much tighter than Mintlify's 5-seat free plan.
- Who should switch: Switch here if you are mostly solo and want the richest free docs editing and publishing stack.
Slab
FTV 53 / 100Slab's free tier is perpetual and aimed at internal knowledge bases. It includes up to 10 users, unlimited posts and topics, realtime collaboration, templates, verification, unified search, 30 days of usage analytics, single sign-on, 10 standard integrations, and basic support. Its attachment cap is 10 MB and version history runs 90 days, but the user limit is broader than Mintlify's starter seat cap. For internal documentation that needs simple collaboration and search, it is a straightforward option.
- Beats Mintlify: It allows up to 10 users on the free tier, which is more headroom than Mintlify's 5 editor seats.
- Falls short: It is narrower on documentation publishing and developer-oriented tooling than Mintlify.
- Who should switch: Switch here if your main need is an internal wiki with a larger free team cap.
SimpleLocalize
FTV 31 / 100SimpleLocalize's free offer is a 14-day trial with 250 translation keys, unlimited strings, 10 projects, 10 languages, and 90 days of activity and history log. It is not a docs platform in the same sense as Mintlify, but it does include translation-hosting workflow pieces for content teams that need structured multilingual management. If your documentation problem is really a localization problem, the free access can be enough to test the workflow before choosing a paid plan.
- Beats Mintlify: It gives you a clearer multi-project and multi-language quota structure on the free entry point.
- Falls short: It is about localization, not documentation hosting or knowledge bases.
- Who should switch: Switch here only if your docs work is really about managing translations and multilingual content.
Two quick picks
ReadMe
ReadMe is the closest drop-in for teams already publishing docs, because it covers a similar documentation-hosting workflow with custom domain support, custom components, branches, reusable content, and an API plus MCP surface. The free tier stays perpetual and broad, with the main constraint being one project and one published version.
Slab
Slab gives the most free room on the main team-cap axis, with up to 10 users on the free plan and unlimited posts and topics. If your main blocker is Mintlify's 5-seat cap, Slab leaves the most free collaboration headroom before you have to pay.
Frequently asked questions
Which alternative is best if I need a free plan, not just a trial?
Slab, ReadMe, and GitBook are the main perpetual free options here. Slab is the most generous on free user count, while ReadMe and GitBook give more docs-platform depth.
Which option is closest to Mintlify for developer documentation?
ReadMe is usually the closest fit because it combines docs hosting, custom components, branches, reusable content, custom domain support, and developer-facing features like an API and MCP server.
Which alternative gives the most collaboration headroom for free?
Slab, because its free plan allows up to 10 users. Mintlify's free tier is capped at 5 editor seats.
If I only want to test before buying, which trial is broadest?
Slite is the broadest trial here for knowledge-base style work, because it opens up a large chunk of the product for 14 days, including unlimited docs, integrations, API access, and attachment storage per user.
Bottom line
For the most common case, ReadMe is the best place to look next. It is the closest match for teams already using Mintlify for documentation hosting, because the free tier still gives you a real docs workflow: one project, one published version, branches, reusable content, custom MDX, custom domain support, and developer tools like the API and MCP Server. If your issue is Mintlify's seat cap or its split between starter and paid AI features, ReadMe is the most natural step sideways.
Read the full listing for Mintlify. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.