Alternatives

6 free alternatives to Render

If you need more than 25 services, 500 build minutes, one workspace, or one team seat on the free plan, you should look elsewhere because Render's free tier is built for small personal projects and hits those limits quickly.

Category: App PlatformsVerified

Where Render's free tier stops

Render Render's free tier stops at Hobby workspace access for personal projects and prototypes, with 1 workspace, 1 project, 1 team seat, and up to 25 services per workspace. It also caps usage at 5 GB of bandwidth per month, 500 build minutes per month, 5 retained builds, and 7 days of log retention. Free web services are limited to 512 MB RAM and 0.1 CPU, free Render Postgres has 256 MB RAM, 100 connections, and a 30-day limit, and free Key Value is capped at 25 MB RAM and 50 connections. A card is required.

Switch table

RenderLeapcellKoyebVercelDeno Deploy8baseNetlify
services or active apps25 services per workspace20 projects1 web service and 1 Postgres database per organization1 project20 active apps1 frontend application per project1 preview server
bandwidth or transfer per month5 GB bandwidth per month2 GB data transfer per month100 GB outbound per month100 GB Fast Data Transfer per month20 GB egress bandwidth2 GB per month300 credits per month
build minutes or build time500 build minutes per month60 minutes of build execution per monthUnknownUnknownUp to 15 hours of CPU time per monthUnknown1 concurrent build
team seats or members1 team seatUnknownUnknown1 developer seatUp to 5 team members1 team member1 free member
storage25 MB Key Value storage; 256 MB Postgres RAM; 30-day Postgres limitRedis 1 GB bandwidth; log storage 100 MB2 GB SSD on web service; 1 GB Postgres storage1 GB Blob storage per month1 GiB volume storage; 1 GiB KV storage0.5 GB of filesBlob storage included; capacity not specified
database capacity1 free Postgres database with 256 MB RAM and 100 connections; 25 MB Key ValueManaged PostgreSQL included; storage not fully specified in free itemsFree Postgres database with 1 GB storage, 0.25 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 5 hours active time/month1 GB Blob storage; 10,000 Blob simple ops; 2,000 advanced ops1 GiB of volume storage; 1 GiB of KV storage2,500 database rows; 0.5 GB filesNetlify Database Basic; capacity not specified
Card required-NoNoUnknownNoNoUnknown
First paid tier-Hobby, varies by usagePro, $29/mo +computePro, $20/moPro, $20/monthDeveloper, $25/moPersonal, $9/month

The alternatives

Leapcell

FTV 56 / 100

Leapcell's free Hobby plan gives you 20 projects, support for Next.js, Python, Go, Rust, and more, plus monthly quotas for serverless usage, Redis, builds, logs, and async tasks. You get up to 3 vCPUs and 4 GB RAM per project, 100,000 serverless invocations, 3 GB-hours of serverless duration, 2 GB of transfer, 100,000 Redis commands, 60 build minutes, and 7-day metrics retention. It also includes custom domains with SSL, logs, and traffic analytics. Compared with Render, it offers much more compute per project and a broader serverless workload model. It falls short on workspace-style simplicity and does not give you Render's managed hosting primitives in the same way. Switch if you want a free app platform with more per-app headroom and can work within a project-centric model.

  • Beats Render: More compute per project: up to 3 vCPUs and 4 GB RAM
  • Falls short: Less workspace-oriented and fewer managed hosting primitives
  • Who should switch: Switch here if your free app needs more CPU and memory than Render's 0.1 CPU, 512 MB service cap.

Koyeb

FTV 34 / 100

Koyeb's free tier includes one web service and one Postgres database per organization, with 512 MB RAM, 0.1 vCPU, 2 GB SSD, 100 GB outbound bandwidth, and community support. The free Postgres also includes 1 GB of storage, 0.25 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, and 5 hours of active time per month at $0 per hour. That makes it a simple way to run a tiny web app plus a database without monthly spend, and the bandwidth allowance is far above Render's 5 GB. It falls short on breadth, since you only get one web service and one database. Switch if your main constraint is bandwidth or you only need a single small service and database.

  • Beats Render: 100 GB outbound bandwidth per month
  • Falls short: Only one free web service and one free Postgres database per org
  • Who should switch: Switch here if Render's 5 GB bandwidth cap is the first thing blocking you.

Vercel

FTV 53 / 100

Vercel's free Hobby plan is for personal, non-commercial use and includes deployment from a repo, automatic CI/CD, a global CDN, DDoS mitigation, traffic and performance insights, 1M Edge Requests, 100 GB Fast Data Transfer, 1 GB Blob storage, and 1 developer seat. It also includes Functions, Workflow events, Queues API operations, rate limiting, image transformations, and built-in security features like WAF protection. Compared with Render, it gives far more edge and frontend-oriented delivery capacity and much richer client-side platform features. It falls short if you want the classic always-on service and database model that Render emphasizes. Switch if your workload is a web app or frontend-heavy deployment and you value edge delivery over workspace-based hosting.

  • Beats Render: Much larger edge and transfer quotas: 1M Edge Requests and 100 GB transfer
  • Falls short: More frontend and edge focused, less centered on always-on services and databases
  • Who should switch: Switch here if you care more about web delivery and edge compute than Render-style service hosting.

Deno Deploy

FTV 58 / 100

Deno Deploy's free plan includes 1M inbound HTTP requests per month, 20 GB egress, up to 50 custom domains per organization, 15 hours of CPU time, 350 GB-hours of memory time, 20 active apps, 5 team members, 1 GiB of volume storage, 1 GiB of KV storage, KV read and write quotas, one database region, cache APIs, real-time log streaming, 1 day of log retention, and Terraform deployment support. It also includes sandboxed code execution and community support via Discord. Against Render, it offers much more request volume, broader app count, and far more custom domains on the free tier. It falls short if you need Render's managed Postgres and Key Value services, or a more general app platform beyond Deno and edge-style deployments. Switch if you want generous free usage for TypeScript-first serverless apps.

  • Beats Render: 1M requests per month and up to 20 active apps
  • Falls short: Less aligned with managed app services like Render Postgres and KV
  • Who should switch: Switch here if you are deploying TypeScript or JavaScript apps and need more free request headroom.

8base

FTV 45 / 100

8base's free plan covers backend web app building with serverless functions, GraphQL API access, CLI access, community support, 1 team member, 1 frontend application per project, previewing and deployment, asset storage, theming, CI/CD environments, authorization profiles, authentication, custom functions, GraphQL subscriptions, custom API domains with SSL, database views, custom indexes, hosting region selection, encryption, backup and restore, and a frontend CDN. The free tier also includes up to 2,500 database rows, 0.5 GB of files, 1 GB-hour of serverless computing, 2 GB of bandwidth, 100,000 GraphQL API calls, 100,000 subscription events, and up to 5 client app users. Compared with Render, it gives you a more opinionated backend and data layer. It falls short on general hosting flexibility and has very small storage and usage limits. Switch if your free project is more of a backend app or GraphQL product than a general deployment target.

  • Beats Render: Built-in backend and GraphQL features with 100,000 API calls
  • Falls short: Much smaller storage and compute headroom than Render's app-hosting focus
  • Who should switch: Switch here if you want a free backend-first platform with GraphQL and data modeling built in.

Netlify

FTV 43 / 100

Netlify's free plan is free forever and includes 300 credits per month, deploys from AI, Git, or API, unlimited deploy previews, custom domains with SSL, Functions and AI models, Netlify Database Basic, Blob storage, firewall traffic rules, a global CDN, 1 member, 1 concurrent build, 1 preview server, and short retention windows for observability and logs. It is a strong fit for static sites and frontend apps that benefit from previews and a simple Git-based workflow. Compared with Render, it offers a wider set of frontend deployment paths and unlimited previews, but it is more constrained on build concurrency and monthly credits. Switch if your use case is a site or frontend app where preview workflows matter more than service count.

  • Beats Render: Unlimited deploy previews
  • Falls short: Only 1 concurrent build and 300 credits per month
  • Who should switch: Switch here if your main need is frontend previews and simple static or app hosting.

Two quick picks

Closest drop-in

Vercel

Vercel is the closest drop-in for builders shipping web apps from Git with previews, CDN delivery, and deployment automation. The workflow feels familiar to teams moving away from Render's app hosting, even though the platform is more frontend and edge oriented.

Most free headroom

Deno Deploy

Deno Deploy gives the most obvious free headroom on request volume, active apps, custom domains, and team size, while still keeping a broad monthly quota set. It is the best fit when you want the most room before needing to pay.

Frequently asked questions

Which alternative is closest to Render for a general web app with a database?

Koyeb is the nearest if you want a small always-free web service plus Postgres. Leapcell is also close if you want more compute per app and can work in a project-based model.

Which alternative gives the highest free bandwidth?

Koyeb stands out with 100 GB outbound per month. Vercel also offers 100 GB Fast Data Transfer, which is strong for frontend delivery.

Which alternative has the best free tier for TypeScript apps?

Deno Deploy is the best fit for TypeScript-first serverless apps, with 1M requests, 20 GB egress, and Terraform support.

Which alternative is best if I need unlimited deploy previews?

Netlify is the clear choice because its free plan includes unlimited deploy previews, though its build concurrency and credits are limited.

Bottom line

For the most common Render free-tier miss, Vercel is the best alternative: it is the easiest move if you are deploying a Git-connected web app and want previews, CDN delivery, and automatic CI/CD without changing your workflow too much. If you are specifically hitting Render's service-count or bandwidth caps, Deno Deploy is better for raw free headroom, but Vercel is the most straightforward replacement for many frontend and app deployment setups.

Read the full listing for Render. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.