6 free alternatives to RocketGit

GitGud.io is free for unlimited private repositories and does not impose a repository size limit for code and development content. It also adds adjacent project tooling at no cost, including free GitLab CI runner access by request, static site hosting with custom domains, a free container registry, wiki support, kanban boards, snippets, service desk tickets, and direct administrator support. That makes it more than just repository storage. The main tradeoff is that it is a broader GitLab-style environment rather than a simple hosting-only setup. Switch here if you want your free Git host to cover CI, pages, docs, and team workflow in one place.

• Beats RocketGit: More free adjacent tooling, especially CI/CD and project management.
• Falls short: Less of a plain, minimal Git-only fit than RocketGit.
• Who should switch: Switch if your free tier needs to cover repositories plus CI, pages, or team workflow features.

See the full listing · Compare with RocketGit

GitHub's free tier includes unlimited public and private repositories, plus Issues and Projects for planning and tracking, Dependabot security and version updates, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes per month, and 500 MB of GitHub Packages storage. That gives you a broader collaboration and automation surface than RocketGit's repo-only free offering. The tradeoff is that the free tier is capped on Actions minutes and package storage, so it is not as unbounded as RocketGit for pure hosting. Choose GitHub if your team wants the familiar repository workflow plus lightweight automation and package hosting without paying right away.

• Beats RocketGit: CI minutes and package storage are included on the free tier.
• Falls short: RocketGit is more open-ended for repository hosting itself.
• Who should switch: Switch if you want repository hosting plus built-in issues, projects, automation, and packages.

See the full listing

GitLab Free includes source code management and CI/CD access, up to 5 licensed users, 400 compute minutes per month, and 10 GiB of storage per project. It is a better fit than RocketGit when you want a hosted Git platform with an opinionated DevOps workflow built in, not just repository storage. The free tier is limited, though, and GitLab Duo Agent Platform credits are not included. Compared with RocketGit, the tradeoff is tighter caps and a more structured free tier. Pick GitLab if your priority is combining Git hosting with CI/CD and a project workflow under one roof.

• Beats RocketGit: Built-in CI/CD and project workflow features on the free plan.
• Falls short: RocketGit has no published free quota caps on repositories.
• Who should switch: Switch if you want a Git host that includes CI/CD and can work as a wider DevOps platform.

See the full listing

sourcehut's free access covers git.sr.ht, hg.sr.ht, todo.sr.ht, lists.sr.ht, Project hub, pages, and paste during public alpha, and it also allows an account without payment if you only contribute to existing projects. That makes it attractive for contributors who want a lightweight, standards-based environment rather than a repository-only host. The catch is that builds.sr.ht and chat.sr.ht require payment, and hosting your own projects is what triggers the paid path. Relative to RocketGit, sourcehut offers more breadth in collaboration and publishing, but its free access is tied to public alpha conditions.

• Beats RocketGit: More kinds of free services beyond Git hosting, including lists and pages.
• Falls short: RocketGit's free repositories are not tied to a public-alpha condition.
• Who should switch: Switch if you mostly contribute to existing projects and want a broader, minimalist developer suite.

See the full listing

AWS CodeCommit's free tier gives you access for 1 active user per month, up to 50 GB-month of repository storage, and up to 10,000 Git requests per month, with indefinite free tier availability for new and existing AWS customers. For a small team or an AWS-centric workflow, that is a concrete hosting package with measurable usage caps and low operational overhead. The downside is that it is not as open-ended as RocketGit's unlimited repositories, and the free tier is shaped around AWS usage patterns rather than a general-purpose public or private repo host. Use it if you want a managed private Git service with explicit monthly quotas.

• Beats RocketGit: A free storage and request quota is included for AWS-style managed hosting.
• Falls short: RocketGit is unlimited for both public and private repositories.
• Who should switch: Switch if you want a managed private Git service with AWS integration and clear usage caps.

See the full listing

Beanstalk's intro tier gives you access for 1 user, 1 repository, and 100 MB of storage, with no credit card required. It is the most straightforward option here if you want a very small, low-friction starter setup for code review and deployment workflows. Compared with RocketGit, it adds a full hosted workflow product rather than just repository hosting, but the free tier is much smaller and quickly runs out for real projects. Choose Beanstalk only if you are testing the platform on a tiny repo and care more about workflow features than free capacity.

• Beats RocketGit: Includes a hosted workflow product with no card required.
• Falls short: RocketGit is far more generous on free repository count.
• Who should switch: Switch if you only need a tiny starter repo and want to try a hosted Git workflow without a card.

See the full listing