Alternatives

6 free alternatives to Web Scraping API

Builders who need more than 1,000 requests a month, or who hit the 1 request per second limit, should look elsewhere because the free tier is small but still real, so it runs out quickly for ongoing scraping.

Category: Web Scraping APIsVerified

Where Web Scraping API's free tier stops

Web Scraping API Web Scraping API's free tier stops at 1,000 requests per free account and 1 request per second. That makes it fine for a short test run or a low-volume workflow, but it is not built for sustained scraping or bursty jobs. Once you need more monthly throughput, or you need to send requests faster than one per second, you are outside the free allowance and will need another option or a paid plan.

Switch table

Web Scraping APIScraper's ProxyScraperAPIZenscrapeSimplescraperFirecrawlWrapAPI
requests per month1,0001001,000 free API creditsUnknownUnknown500 pages30,000 API calls per month
requests per second1 request per secondUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknownLow rate limitsUnknown
concurrent connectionsUnknownUnknown5 concurrent connectionsUnknownUnknown2 concurrent requestsUnknown
free credits / creditsUnknownUnknown1,000 free API credits1,000 searched credits100 cloud credits500 one-time creditsUnknown
saved recipes / public APIsUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown3 saved recipes; API access includedUnknownPublic APIs must be shared with the community
Card required-NoNoYesUnknownNoNo
First paid tier-PRO - $40 / moHobby - $49 / monthSmall - $59.99 / moPlus - $39 / moHobby - $16/month billed yearlyBusiness - Cloud - Contact us

The alternatives

Scraper's Proxy

FTV 35 / 100

Scraper's Proxy gives you 100 free requests per month. It is a lighter free allowance than Web Scraping API, but it is still a straightforward proxy-based scraping service for fetching raw webpages and handling anonymous requests. The free tier is simple and monthly, so it can work for small tests or very occasional scraping without setting up your own proxy stack. It is a good fit if you mainly want a minimal free entry point and do not need the broader free quota of Abstract's offer. The downside is that the allowance is much smaller, so it is easy to outgrow.

  • Beats Web Scraping API: Proxy-based scraping workflow
  • Falls short: Monthly request quota
  • Who should switch: Switch to this if you want a simple proxy-style API and only need a tiny free monthly allowance.

ScraperAPI

FTV 41 / 100

ScraperAPI gives you 1,000 free API credits on a free account, plus a 7-day trial with 5,000 API credits. It also allows up to 5 concurrent connections on the free account, which is more room for parallel work than a 1 request per second limit. The service is designed to handle proxies, browser rendering, CAPTCHA challenges, and IP rotation, so it stays close to a typical scraping API workflow. It is a better choice if you care about concurrency and a larger starter burst, even though the free structure is more trial-like than a steady monthly allowance.

  • Beats Web Scraping API: Concurrent connections
  • Falls short: No recurring free monthly trial equivalent to 1,000 included requests with the same shape
  • Who should switch: Switch to this if you need more parallelism or a bigger short-term starter burst.

Zenscrape

FTV 47 / 100

Zenscrape includes 1,000 searched credits in the free plan. That is the same basic order of magnitude as Web Scraping API's free request count, and it is aimed at returning HTML through a scraping API with proxy rotation and headless browser support. The free plan is useful if you want a conventional scraping API for small evaluations and light usage. Its main drawback is that the free offer is tied to searched credits and requires a credit card, so it is less frictionless than a no-card free tier. It is best when you value the scraping workflow more than free-tier convenience.

  • Beats Web Scraping API: Scraping workflow depth
  • Falls short: Credit-card requirement
  • Who should switch: Switch to this if you can tolerate card entry and want a traditional scraping API with comparable starter volume.

Simplescraper

FTV 29 / 100

Simplescraper's free offering includes browser scraping, 100 cloud credits for automated scraping, 3 saved recipes, CSV and JSON export, and API access. That makes it broader than a plain request quota because it also covers no-code capture and export workflows. If your scraping work includes manual setup, browser-based extraction, or sharing repeatable recipes, this free tier gives you more product surface to test. It falls short on raw free volume, since the automated cloud credit pool is small compared with a 1,000-request allowance. It is a better switch for builders who want scraping plus workflow tooling.

  • Beats Web Scraping API: Included no-code workflow features
  • Falls short: Free automated volume
  • Who should switch: Switch to this if you want browser-based scraping and exports alongside API access.

Firecrawl

FTV 49 / 100

Firecrawl's free plan gives you 500 one-time credits, up to 500 pages on the free plan, 2 concurrent requests, and low rate limits. It is built for scraping, crawling, search, screenshots, and structured outputs, so the free tier covers a broad modern web-data workflow rather than only raw request volume. The free allowance is smaller than Web Scraping API's 1,000 requests, but the product is more aligned with teams that want page-level scraping and crawl-oriented behavior. It is a strong option if you care more about web data processing features than about a larger simple request cap.

  • Beats Web Scraping API: Page-level crawl workflow
  • Falls short: Free request count
  • Who should switch: Switch to this if your stack needs crawling and structured outputs more than a bigger request quota.

WrapAPI

FTV 61 / 100

WrapAPI's free Community plan includes 30,000 API calls per month, shared infrastructure, public APIs shared with the community, community support, and tools for building APIs with a Chrome extension and API Builder. That is a much larger monthly call allowance than Web Scraping API's free tier, so it is better for high-volume experimentation. The tradeoff is that the APIs are public and shared, which is a meaningful constraint if you need private endpoints or dedicated infrastructure. It is a good fit when your main issue is free volume, not data privacy or isolation.

  • Beats Web Scraping API: Monthly API call volume
  • Falls short: Public, shared APIs
  • Who should switch: Switch to this if your priority is the biggest free call budget and you can live with public endpoints.

Two quick picks

Closest drop-in

ScraperAPI

ScraperAPI is the closest drop-in because it is still a general-purpose scraping API for fetching public pages, handling proxying, browser rendering, CAPTCHA challenges, and IP rotation. The core workflow stays API-first, so switching tends to require the least rework.

Most free headroom

WrapAPI

WrapAPI offers the largest free monthly call budget at 30,000 calls per month, far above the subject's 1,000-request allowance. If raw volume is the main problem, it leaves the most room before you have to pay.

Frequently asked questions

Which alternative gives the most free requests or calls?

WrapAPI, with 30,000 API calls per month on the free Community plan.

Which alternative is closest if I want to keep a standard scraping API workflow?

ScraperAPI is the closest drop-in because it keeps the same API-first scraping model and handles proxies, rendering, and CAPTCHA work.

Which alternatives require no credit card?

Scraper's Proxy, ScraperAPI, Firecrawl, and WrapAPI show no card requirement in the provided data. For Simplescraper, card_required is Unknown. Zenscrape requires a card.

Which free tier is best if I need concurrency?

ScraperAPI is the strongest among these for free concurrency, with up to 5 concurrent connections. Firecrawl allows 2 concurrent requests, while the others do not list a free concurrency limit here.

Bottom line

For the most common case, ScraperAPI is the best alternative to check first. It stays closest to a normal scraping API workflow, so the switch is usually the smallest. If your main pain point is simply that 1,000 requests is not enough, WrapAPI gives far more free call volume, but it changes the product shape more because it is centered on building and sharing APIs rather than just scraping pages.

Read the full listing for Web Scraping API. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.