Alternatives

6 free alternatives to Supabase

Builders who need more than 500 MB of database storage, 5 GB of egress, 1 GB of files, or 500,000 Edge Function invocations should look elsewhere, because Supabase's free tier caps the core project limits while still requiring a card to start.

Category: Backend PlatformsVerified

Where Supabase's free tier stops

Supabase Supabase's free tier stays usable for small projects, but it stops at specific monthly and per-project limits. You get unlimited API requests, 50,000 monthly active users, a 500 MB database size per project, 5 GB egress, 5 GB cached egress, 1 GB file storage, 500,000 Edge Function invocations, and 2 active projects. Free projects also pause after 1 week of inactivity, logs are retained for 1 day, and the free plan includes only community support. Once a project needs more storage, more traffic headroom, or longer-lived activity, the free tier is at its edge.

Switch table

Supabase8baseNeon Serverless PostgresAppwriteConvexAmazon Aurora DSQLUpstash
database size per project500 MB database size per project2,500 database rows0.5 GB storage per project1 database0.5 GB database storage total1 GB of storage free each month256 MB data size limit
active projects / databases2 active projects1 backend application and 1 frontend application per project100 projects2 projects40 deployments maximumNot stated1 free database included
egress or bandwidth5 GB egress, 5 GB cached egress2 GB per month of bandwidthNot stated5GB API bandwidth per month1 GB data egress per monthFirst 100,000 DPUs free each month10 GB monthly bandwidth limit
file storage1 GB file storage0.5 GB of files0.5 GB storage per project2GB storage1 GB file storage totalNot stated100 MB max record size
monthly usage calls or executions500,000 Edge Function invocations100,000 GraphQL API calls per month100 CU-hours per project monthly750K executions per month1M function calls per monthFirst 100,000 DPUs free each month500K monthly commands included
monthly active users50,000 monthly active users5 client app users60K MAUs75K monthly active usersNot statedNot statedNot stated
Card required-UnknownNoUnknownUnknownUnknownNo
First paid tier-Developer $25/mo.Launch varies by usagePro from $25/monthProfessional $25 per developer/monthAurora DSQL paid usage varies by usagePay as You Go $0.2 per 100K commands

The alternatives

8base

FTV 45 / 100

8base's free plan gives you a GraphQL backend, serverless functions, CLI access, community support, deployment, asset storage, auth, custom functions, and GraphQL subscriptions. It also includes 1 team member, 1 frontend app per project, up to 2,500 database rows, 0.5 GB of files, 1 GB-hour of serverless compute, 2 GB per month of bandwidth, 100,000 GraphQL API calls, 100,000 subscription events, and support for up to 5 client app users. Its main advantage over Supabase is the built-in app-platform workflow with frontend hosting and GraphQL-first development. It falls short on scale, especially database rows, bandwidth, and active users. Switch here if you want a more app-builder-oriented free stack and your project is still very small.

  • Beats Supabase: Built-in frontend app hosting and GraphQL app-builder workflow
  • Falls short: Much lower storage, bandwidth, and user scale
  • Who should switch: Switch if you want a frontend-plus-backend free plan and can stay within small GraphQL and hosting limits.

Neon Serverless Postgres free includes up to 100 projects, 100 CU-hours per project each month, 0.5 GB storage per project, databases up to 2 CU with 8 GB RAM, Neon Auth for up to 60K MAUs, 6-hour time travel and restores, autoscaling, branching, read replicas, and unlimited team members. Compared with Supabase, it gives you far more project count and stronger database workflow features like branching and restore windows. It falls short on breadth, since it is mainly a database platform rather than an all-in-one backend with storage, functions, realtime, and integrated APIs. Choose it if your priority is Postgres development and team workflows rather than a bundled backend suite.

  • Beats Supabase: Far more projects plus database branching and restore features
  • Falls short: No bundled backend stack like storage, functions, or realtime
  • Who should switch: Switch if you mainly need managed Postgres with strong database workflow tools.

Appwrite

FTV 47 / 100

Appwrite's free tier includes 5 GB API bandwidth per month, 2 GB storage, 750K executions, 75K monthly active users, community support, 1 database, 1 bucket, and 2 functions per project. It also allows 15-minute build timeouts, pauses free projects after 1 week of inactivity, and limits you to 2 projects. Against Supabase, its biggest advantage is the higher included execution allowance and a simpler cap set for app backends. It falls short on file storage and overall project flexibility, especially because Supabase includes more free storage, more active projects, and broader integrated platform features. Pick Appwrite if you want an app backend with a clear free execution ceiling.

  • Beats Supabase: Higher free execution allowance for backend workloads
  • Falls short: Less storage and fewer active projects
  • Who should switch: Switch if your free-tier bottleneck is function or execution volume more than storage.

Convex

FTV 50 / 100

Convex's free Starter plan includes access for 1 to 6 developers, file storage, text search, vector search, crons, auth, Node.js actions, a health and insights dashboard, preview deployments, selectable data region, serverless deployment type, S16 deployment class, 1,000 concurrent sessions, 16 concurrent queries, 64 concurrent actions, 1M function calls per month, 20 GB-hours of action compute, 0.5 GB database storage, 1 GB file storage, 0.5 GB search storage, 1 GB database I/O, 3,000 search query-GBs, and 1 GB data egress. It beats Supabase on included function calls and reactive app workflow features like crons and search. It falls short on raw database and traffic headroom, since Supabase gives more egress and more overall backend breadth. Switch if you want a TypeScript-first backend and your free usage is mostly compute and app logic.

  • Beats Supabase: More free function calls and TypeScript-first backend workflow
  • Falls short: Less egress and less general backend breadth
  • Who should switch: Switch if your app lives in Convex-style backend code and you want more free compute allowance.

Amazon Aurora DSQL

FTV 43 / 100

Amazon Aurora DSQL's free tier gives you the first 100,000 DPUs free each month and 1 GB of storage free each month, with the free tier applied automatically to your bill and scoped per management account under AWS Organizations. Its main advantage over Supabase is that it is a database-only option with monthly usage credits and no app-layer extras to manage. It falls short on developer convenience and bundled features, since it does not include auth, storage, realtime, or edge functions. Choose it if you only need serverless SQL storage and want a minimal database bill to start.

  • Beats Supabase: Database-only free usage credits with monthly reset
  • Falls short: No bundled auth, storage, realtime, or functions
  • Who should switch: Switch if you just need a managed SQL database and do not need a full backend platform.

Upstash

FTV 47 / 100

Upstash's free tier includes 1 database, 256 MB data size, 500K monthly commands, 10,000 max commands per second, 10 MB max request size, 100 MB max record size, 10 GB monthly bandwidth, 1 index, and 10K documents per index, with community support and free bandwidth usage. It is the best fit when you want a very small, serverless data layer with no credit card required. Compared with Supabase, it is much narrower, but it can be easier to adopt for cache, session, queue, or key-value use cases. It falls short on relational database features and full backend tooling, so it is not a drop-in match for an app platform. Switch if your workload is simple data access and command volume, not a full Postgres backend.

  • Beats Supabase: No-card start and a very lightweight serverless data layer
  • Falls short: Not a full relational backend platform
  • Who should switch: Switch if you need a small serverless data store instead of a full backend platform.

Two quick picks

Closest drop-in

Neon Serverless Postgres

Neon is the closest Postgres-first replacement if you want managed database infrastructure with strong workflow features and minimal behavior change. It keeps the mental model centered on Postgres while offering branching, autoscaling, restores, and team-friendly limits without forcing you into a different app platform.

Most free headroom

Neon Serverless Postgres

Neon gives the most free headroom for database-centric projects because it includes 100 projects, unlimited team members, 100 CU-hours per project monthly, and 60K MAUs, all while staying on a free plan with no card required. That combination leaves the most room before paywall pressure.

Frequently asked questions

Which alternative is closest to Supabase for Postgres workloads?

Neon Serverless Postgres is the closest match if your main need is managed Postgres with developer workflow features. It is the least disruptive switch for database-centric projects.

Which alternative gives the most free usage overall?

For database-heavy use, Neon stands out with 100 projects and unlimited team members. For function-heavy use, Convex offers 1M function calls per month. The best choice depends on the bottleneck.

Which free alternatives do not require a credit card?

Neon Serverless Postgres and Upstash explicitly do not require a card. For the others here, the card requirement is not stated in the provided plan details or is not waived.

Which option is best if I only need a database, not a full backend platform?

Amazon Aurora DSQL is the most focused database-only alternative in this set. Upstash can also work for very small serverless data workloads, but it is not a Postgres backend replacement.

Bottom line

For the common case, Neon Serverless Postgres is the best alternative to try first. It stays closest to the Postgres-centered workflow most Supabase users want, but its free tier gives much more room on projects, team size, and database workflow features like branching and restores. If your app is mostly database-led and you want a low-friction switch, Neon is the most practical place to go next.

Read the full listing for Supabase. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more alternatives on /alternatives, or head-to-head comparisons on /compare.