Comparison

Teamwork.com vs TimeCamp: free tier comparison

TimeCamp wins for most builders because its free tier is actually broad enough for ongoing use with unlimited users and projects, while Teamwork.com’s free plan is capped at 5 users and 5 projects.

Category: Project ManagementVerified

Quick answer

TimeCamp - TimeCamp wins for most builders because its free tier is actually broad enough for ongoing use with unlimited users and projects, while Teamwork.com’s free plan is capped at 5 users and 5 projects.

How the free tiers compare

These products solve different problems even though they both sit in project management and productivity. Teamwork.com is the more full-featured project delivery suite: it gives you task views, client organization, time logging, chat connections, and a limited but real slice of project management. The tradeoff is tight caps, especially 5 projects and 5 users, so it fits a small client services team or a solo operator managing a few engagements. TimeCamp is much lighter as a free plan, but the shape of its free tier is better for staying free longer: unlimited users, unlimited projects, timesheets, apps, 2-factor authentication, and AI time tracking. If you want a broader project hub, Teamwork is stronger. If you want a no-cost time tracking baseline that does not force an early upgrade, TimeCamp is the safer default.

Teamwork.com vs TimeCamp free tier, side by side

Teamwork.comFTV 49TimeCampFTV 54
Free projectsTeamwork.com is capped; TimeCamp is not.Up to 5Unlimited
Free usersThis is the biggest structural difference in the free tier.Up to 5Unlimited
Free automationsOnly Teamwork.com publishes a free automation cap in the provided data.100Not stated
Free project viewsTeamwork.com exposes multiple project views in the free plan.Task, list, board, Gantt, tableNot stated
Time trackingBoth support time capture, but TimeCamp is more focused on it.Log time on projectsTimesheets and AI Time Tracker
SecurityDifferent free-tier strengths, not directly comparable quotas.US or EU data hosting2-factor authentication

After you outgrow the free tier

Teamwork.com is per-seat on the first paid tier, starting at Basics for $9.99/user/month billed yearly, then $24.99/user/month for Accelerate. Costs rise with headcount and with the jump to higher operational tiers, while the top plans move to contact sales. TimeCamp is also per-seat for its paid tiers, starting at Basic for $7/user/month billed annually, then climbing through Pro, Premium, and Ultimate, with Enterprise on contact sales. For small teams, TimeCamp is cheaper at every published paid tier; Teamwork becomes a better buy only if you need its project-management and client-work features.

Teamwork.com next stepBasics - $9.99/user/month billed yearlyPer seat
TimeCamp next stepBasic - $7/user/month billed annuallyPer seat

Cost at real usage

UsageTeamwork.comTimeCamp
5 users, 5 projectsTeamwork.com stays free at this size if you stay within the project cap.Free (within tier)Free (within tier)
6 users, 10 projectsTeamwork.com would need a paid plan because the free tier caps at 5 users and 5 projects.At least $59.94/mo est. for Basics at 6 seats$42/mo on Basic at 6 seats
10 usersPer-seat pricing makes the gap widen as headcount grows.At least $99.90/mo est. for Basics at 10 seats$70/mo on Basic at 10 seats
20 usersBoth are annual-billed per-seat plans in the provided data.At least $199.80/mo est. for Basics at 20 seats$140/mo on Basic at 20 seats

Estimates, not quotes. Usage-based rates change - verify with the vendor's pricing page before committing.

When to pick each one

Pick Teamwork.com when…

  • You run a small client services business and need task boards, Gantt views, client organization, and time logging in one place.
  • You only need to manage up to 5 active projects and up to 5 people, so the free caps will not block you soon.
  • You want chat tool connections and multiple project views without paying immediately.
  • You are okay with a project management tool that is clearly designed as a small starter slice before the paid per-seat plans.
  • You care more about project delivery workflows than deep time-tracking breadth.

Pick TimeCamp when…

  • You need unlimited users for a whole team, even if only a few people will log time regularly.
  • You want unlimited projects so the free tier can stay useful as work grows.
  • Your core use case is timesheets and work-hour tracking across web, desktop, mobile, and browser workflows.
  • You want 2-factor authentication on the free plan.
  • You are choosing a no-cost time tracking tool first and only later deciding whether to add paid analytics or enterprise controls.

Bottom line

For the most common builder who wants a free tier that can actually support a small team, TimeCamp is the better default. Its unlimited users and projects make it much easier to keep using without hitting a wall. Teamwork.com is the better pick only if you specifically need project management features like Gantt views, client organization, and a broader delivery workflow, and you can live with the 5-user, 5-project ceiling. If you expect the team to grow, TimeCamp gives you more room before you have to pay.

Read the full listings: Teamwork.com and TimeCamp. Scores use the FTV methodology at /ftv. Browse more head-to-heads on /compare, or see the top-ranked free tiers on /top.